
Last weekend, in the Labour Day Classic, the Saskatchewan Roughriders thumped the Winnipeg Blue Bombers by a score of 29-14.
(For readers who don’t know, the Canadian Football League hosts a number of particularly nasty rivalries on Labour Day weekend, including Winnipeg/Sasktchewan, Calgary/Edmonton and Hamilton/Toronto.)
The week after the Labour Day Classic is often a time for the rematch, giving the other team home field advantage. In the case of Winnipeg/Saskatchewan, this rematch has been christened the Banjo Bowl. And it’s today. (Live stream from the Winnipeg Free Press)
Seeing as how my dad is from Winnipeg and my mom is from Saskatchewan and my last name is Hamilton, I spent my youth trying to find a CFL team to root for. Although I live in Manitoba, we’re about half-way between Bomber and Rider territory, so I could legitimately lean either way.
Finally, though, my dad’s apparent waning of interest in football, combined with my uncle’s (on my mom’s side) ever-green exuberance, has won me over to the Roughriders’ side. Plus, although the Riders play in Regina, I’m heartened by the fact that they play on behalf of the whole province — unlike the Perimeteritis-afflicted Bombers.
To make amends for not supporting my paternal football team, I do tend to occasionally pick up Labatt Blue, as far as I know the only beer named after a sports team in the world.
Now, though, there’s competition for my alcoholic team loyalties — yes, Rider Pride, the wine.
Although it apparently comes in a Chardonnay as well, I was lucky enough to get a sample of the Merlot. It’s a 2008 vintage, from Chile, and if you pay attention to the label, it was actually imported through Alberta, so I don’t know what you can say about the Saskatchewan bona fides. Some suggest that a chokecherry, rhubarb or dandelion wine would have been more a propos, and I worry about the “whine” homophone plus the fey attitude of the beverage as a whole, but I guess not every team can have its own beer. And I’m not sure that’s it’s legal to sell liquor-soaked watermelons.
That said, a good wine has two or three times the alcohol content of most beers, and a robust red could be just the thing with a thick tailgated steak. Even the Chardonnay would be a fine accompaniment to a spicy plate of nachos.

The deep colour of the Rider Pride wine was promising, but right from the start, the wine’s nose, or aroma, was on the vinegar side. It was quite sharp, and a little off-putting. (Rider fan jokes go here, for all of you Bomber fans.) I decided before sampling that I would read what the back of the bottle said.

After some standard “Riders fans are the best” suck-upping, the wine promises “ripe tannins and a long finish …. Fruity undertones and a rich and creamy texture.”
Well, that sounded pretty fine. And the proposed accompaniment — light meat dishes — sounded like it would go well with the barbecue we had planned.
But there was still the small issue of the not-all-that-great aroma. Time to put it to the test.

Well, this tester described the wine as having a taste like old shoes. Perhaps it’s a locker room allusion?
I wouldn’t go that far. But there was little enough to recommend about this wine. It’s unfortunate, because I would really like to crack open a bottle and enjoy it as I watch the Riders thump the Bombers. But this Merlot had a harsh, almost chemical taste to it. It was strong, sure, and it would stand up to spicy football foods — even a smokie with sauerkraut, I’m sure — but it wasn’t a delight to quaff at all.
Perhaps we just had a bad bottle. Or perhaps this was a bad year, and next year’s bottling will be superior.
But I can’t shake the feeling that this wine — at $15.64 a bottle — is simply an inflated cash-grab by a money-hungry Albertan.