In the Ars Technica “Weird Science” roundup, they link to a report that should interest any and all denizens of public transit:

A bus pulls up at a stop that’s so densely packed with commuters that they practically explode out when the doors are opened. Less than a minute later, it’s followed by a pair of nearly empty busses, running along the same route. Apparently, that’s a mathematical inevitability, termed the “Equal Headway Instability.”

The authors of this paper create a model that can reproduce the equal headway problem, and then try various solutions under the assumption that the current behavior seriously annoys commuters. Unfortunately, none of their solutions—minimum and maximum waiting times at stops, limited boarding, etc.—work well under all conditions, and the authors recognize that having commuters watch an unfilled bus pull away is also going to piss them off. The solutions, not surprisingly, are basic commute manners: stand away from the doors, let people out first, and don’t pile into an overstuffed bus. Conductors have been saying all of that for years—good luck getting impatient commuters to go along.

This reminds me of something I read the purported to prove (again, mathematically) that queues and lineups were, basically, backwards. Instead of first-come, first-serve (so, the person who has been waiting longest in line gets served first), the authors suggested that the people who had been waiting the least amount of time get served first. That would mean that the people who were not willing to wait (and therefore apparently desired what they were waiting for the least) had the least chance of clogging up the queue. It’s counterintutive, and it just seems unfair, but they mathematicians swear that it works.

 

foresthills

In this photo, from Joe Shlabotnik’s photostream on Flickr, you can see the types of townhouses they have in the suburb of Forest Hills Garden, in Queens, New York. Based on the style, you’d never guess that it was part of a planned community, built using pre-fab concrete decades before anyone else thought to, right?

There’s a fascintating slideshow on Slate about Forest Hills Garden and how it came to be. It was ahead of its time — we’re just now starting to come back to its mixed-use, transit-oriented, walkable community plan. Says Slate:

Forest Hills has a variety of single-family houses: attached, semidetached, and freestanding. The aim of having many housing types was partly to give more choices to buyers and partly to create the kind of visual variety found in old towns. This is very different from the sort of homogeneity that characterizes most modern suburbs.

Homogeneity and, I would argue, soullessness.

Mar 122009
 

Here’s a column asking that question — a question that I’m sure Winnipeggers should be interested in following:

“Bus rapid transit,” or B.R.T. — a model successfully implemented in cities from Bogota to Los Angeles — is gaining currency. The term refers to modern bus systems that use dedicated bus lanes to get around. Often the buses look sleeker and have more amenities, such as automatic glass doors on the stations, than regular city buses.

The comments are just getting started (25 as I type this), but there are already some good ones making the case for light rail. The consensus seems to be that busses don’t live up to their promise, while light rail mostly does.

My own take is that Winnipeg will — as Manitobans everywhere are wont to do — study the issue to death, and spend so much money on consultants that the inflation-battered cost of either system will be such a shock they’ll cheap out on a system that’s riddled with compromise.

Carnac the Magnificent, that’s me.

Bus transit, the Limewire way

 Posted by Grant Hamilton on 3 February 2009  Modern Life
Feb 032009
 

Is open-source the solution to everything? So far, it’s replaced my web browser, my word processor and its on its way to replacing my operating system and my Photoshop. But mass transit?

0Bus service in Brandon, where I live, does its best, but is of little use to most people. The city is just too spread out, with too little density, for transit service to be anything but barebones. There just aren’t enough people travelling on it. Despite some really forward thinking ideas, like biodiesel (which they’ve had for years, on the “French Fry Bus”), smaller mini-buses, and interactive route finders, I fear that public transit in Brandon is always going to be a very poor cousin to the car.

Down the highway in Winnipeg, it’s a similar situation. Plans for a light rail system, or even bus rapid transit, are oft-proposed, oft-promised, oft-planned and oft-put-off. There’s even a map kicking around of the Winnipeg subway system idea from the 1950s. (I won’t link to the thousands of blogosphere posts detailing the rise and fall of each individual plan, but there’s a fairly good overview of news here, though it hasn’t been updated in a couple of months, and it’s been up and down a lot even since there.)

But, like it’s done with so many things, can the internet shake things up in the realm of mass transit, too?

Read more, after the jump.

Continue reading »