There’s likely only about seven people that truly understand Einstein’s theories and all the spin-offs, repercussions and implications. I am not one of those people.
I do dig physics and like to read about how our understanding (“our” = humankind’s, not necessarily yours or mine) of the universe is ever-growing. There are constantly news stories about discoveries and theories and whatnot, but most of them, I am sorry to say, are over my head. Or, alternatively, they incorporate too much math for me to enjoy. I know math, I understand math, but I don’t necessarily want to read it for leisure.
But I digress.
Much like the incredible epicness of the LHC (which I’ve posted about before here and here) — a massive technological marvel in both scope and size — that will allow us to better understand the smallest pieces of our universe, another recent experiment has recently turned out some results but on a much grander scale.
Way back in 1963, an experiment was begun in order to determine Einstein knew what the hell he was talking about when he said that, according to general relativity, the mass of the Earth should distort the space-time fabric around it. As science-fictiony as that sounds, almost 50 years ago NASA began funding a project called Gravity Probe B (GP-B).
Yesterday, some results were announced:
“The space-time around Earth appears to be distorted just as general relativity predicts,” says Stanford University physicist Francis Everitt, principal investigator of the Gravity Probe B mission.
Two questions immediately pop to mind:
- How do they know?
- So what?
To answer the second questions first:
The results of Gravity Probe B give physicists renewed confidence that the strange predictions of Einstein’s theory are indeed correct, and that these predictions may be applied elsewhere. The type of spacetime vortex that exists around Earth is duplicated and magnified elsewhere in the cosmos–around massive neutron stars, black holes, and active galactic nuclei.
The first question is more complex. First of all, it involves an experiment that took “planning, promoting, building, operating, and analyzing data [...] for more than 47 years.” It took the development of 13 new technologies. It required the creation of a gyroscope consisting of four of the most perfect spheres created by humans.
These ping pong-sized balls of fused quartz and silicon are 1.5 inches across and never vary from a perfect sphere by more than 40 atomic layers. If the gyroscopes weren’t so spherical, their spin axes would wobble even without the effects of relativity.
In the end, it was shown that the Earth does affect space-time and that there does, indeed, seem to be Einstein’s hypothetical “space-time” construct.
Although I am absolutely not disputing the importance of this project, with the amount of time, energy, ingenuity and, although the article doesn’t mention it, presumably money spent, why can the scientific community not find a viable alternative to fossil fuels, a cure for cancer, or an end to reality TV?