Big Brother is watching

 Posted by on 29 June 2009  Modern Life
Jun 292009
 

big brother Everything I’ve ever read about the NSA (National Security Agency) has felt like the creation of an author of thriller novels — a large, faceless government agency brimming with unimaginable technology and power.  Because of the unbelievable projects that are purportedly undertaken by this agency, I’ve always felt that what is reported about the NSA is more rumor than fact.

This article from Nova is no exception. The undertakings it claims the NSA are involved in range well into what should be the realm of science fiction:

With the entire Internet and thousands of databases for a brain, the device will be able to respond almost instantaneously to complex questions posed by intelligence analysts. As more and more data is collected—through phone calls, credit card receipts, social networks like Facebook and MySpace, GPS tracks, cell phone geolocation, Internet searches, Amazon book purchases, even E-Z Pass toll records—it may one day be possible to know not just where people are and what they are doing, but what and how they think.

Seriously?  With enough information about my online activities, purchase history and physical movements, it is possible to know what and how I think?  From a theoretical point of view, I can see how that idea could be debated, but from a realistic point of view, I rarely know what I’m thinking myself.  I refuse to believe that a computer will be able to predict what I will be thinking based on my past.  Humans are simply not consistently rational.

As this project expands, they plan on including newpaper information, historical data and other inputs that will allow this computer to have predictive capabilities:

Unregulated, they could ask it to determine which Americans might likely pose a security risk—or have sympathies toward a particular cause, such as the antiwar movement, as was done during the 1960s and 1970s. The Aquaint robospy might then base its decision on the type of books a person purchased online, or chat room talk, or websites visited—or a similar combination of data.

The implications such a machine would have on personal privacy are immense.  And completely terrifying.

May 162009
 

tunguska3

Almost 101 years ago, a gigantic explosion levelled parts of remote Russia. You’ll know it as Tunguska. It was about 1,000 times more powerful than the bomb dropped on Hiroshima, but nobody knows what caused it.

Sure, various theories have arisen, from a black hole puncturing the earth, to a comet or a meteorite, to aliens, to a “natural” hydrogen bomb or even antimatter.

The most intriguing part of the mystery is that there doesn’t appear to be an impact crater (although recent research points to Lake Cheko as a possibility).

Now, an even newer study suggests that the comet responsible actually “skipped” off the atmosphere (after partially exploding) and headed back out into space — to return circa 2045.

But perhaps they are all wrong! What if it was a secret experiment conducted by Nikola Tesla, trying to electrify the earth and give free power to all!

That’s the hypothesis advanced in at least two websites. The Tesla Society links to this site, which says:

The nature of the Tunguska event, also, is consistent with what would happen during the sudden release of wireless power. No fiery object was reported in the skies at that time by professional or amateur astronomers as would be expected when a 200,000,000 pound object enters the atmosphere at tens of thousands miles an hour. Also, the first reporters, from the town of Tomsk, to reach the area judged the stories about a body falling from the sky was the result of the imagination of an impressionable people. He noted there was considerable noise coming from the explosion, but no stones fell. The absence of an impact crater can be explained by there having been no material body to impact. An explosion caused by broadcast power would not leave a crater.

The theory goes that Tesla, broke and desperate, was looking to make a splash:

Given Tesla’s general pacifistic nature it is hard to understand why he would carry out a test harmful to both animals and the people who herded the animals even when he was in the grip of financial desperation. The answer is that he probably intended no harm, but was aiming for a publicity coup and, literally, missed his target.

At the end of 1908, the whole world was following the daring attempt of Peary to reach the North Pole which he claimed in the Spring of 1909. If Tesla wanted the attention of the international press, few things would have been more impressive than the Peary expedition sending out word of a cataclysmic explosion on the ice near or at the North Pole.(37) Tesla, then, if he could not be hailed as the master creator that he was, could be seen as the master of a mysterious new force of destruction. The test, it seems, was not a complete success.

From the presumed “launch place” of Tesla (near New York), you can draw a straight line up and over the North Pole to land at Tunguska.

Intriguing — if true!

May 022009
 

tanning-bed

Tanning beds have always looked vaguely threatening to me — their gaping, clamshell maw, their otherworldly glow, their pod-like appearance when closed … shudder!

Plus, all that cancer talk! But now I’m feeling even more squeamish about them. A 10-year-old girl was reportedly hospitalized — just two minutes away from needing skin grafts — after spending too long in a tanning bed. She has been warned to stay out of direct sunlight for 10 years (!)

The end of privacy?

 Posted by on 16 April 2009  Modern Life
Apr 162009
 

three_surveillance_cameras

I was kind of bullshitting with some friends over beers last night, when I came up with a frightful concept. Just think about the march of technology. Now, how long do you think it will be, before you’ll be able to spend the equivalent of $5 and come home with a hundred or so web-cam quality cameras, the size of a button, magnetic, and with wi-fi and GPS built-in?

Now, with the world flush in cameras like that, how long before someone sets up a Napster or Pirate Bay-style interface, so you can dial in an address, and come up with direct access to the three or four hundred button cameras that are linked-in near that address. Think live Street View, times 100.

We think we’re in an age of ubiquitous information right now, but I don’t think we’ve even scratched the surface.

Apr 112009
 

Well, we’re living in the future. The terrible, awful, dystopic future.

How terrifying that people might be, you know, being people and not automatons while at the wheels of their cars.

(Again, thanks BB. Keep keeping us up-to-date on those quaint, nostalgic things like steampunk and civil liberties.)

Apr 112009
 

In “1984″ George Orwell envisioned a surveillance-based society using two-way televisions. Imagine what he would have done with the Internet?

Frankly, the amount of personal information that we all share via computer is staggering. Now, there’s a site that spoofs just how much data a government collects on its citizens.

statebook-1

Called “Statebook,” the site gives examples of the information that the UK government actually does collect — or could collect with little difficulty (eg. phone calls) — and presents it in a user-friendly social-networking style

None of this is far-fetched. These databases exist. The only thing that doesn’t (yet) exist is the website that ties them all together.

Scary stuff. (Thanks, BB)

Apr 102009
 

I could survive for 51 seconds chained to a bunk bed with a velociraptor

Hat-tip to Pat J., who was testing a blog-to-facebook app on Facebook, which intrigued me, and then I creeped on his blog for a bit. He says he can last 1:35, but I’ll bet he cheated on a couple of the questions.

UPDATE: You can click on the image to take the 10-question quiz yourself, or you can just click here. Lemme know how you did!