As David Brooks, a columnist at the New York Times, points out, “the United States, a nation of 300 million, won nine gold medals this year in the Winter Olympics. Norway, a nation of 4.7 million, also won nine.”

He also points out that this is par for the course. Despite Canada’s record-breaking gold-medal run this year — and America’s record-breaking total-medal-count this year — Norway is the all-time champ in both categories.

As his column posits, this has nothing to do with sports training, or Own The Podium type targeted funding.

Instead, Brooks writes, it’s a combination of “hard” Norwegian individual grittiness with “soft” Norwegian love and nurturing. He explains it with a jaw-dropping story of survival in World War Two:

Baalsrud was clothed and fed and rowed to another island. He showed up at other houses and was taken in. He began walking across the mountain ranges on that island in the general direction of the mainland, hikes of 24, 13 and 28 hours without break.

A 72-year-old man rowed him the final 10 miles to the mainland, past German positions, and gave him skis. Up in the mountains, he skied through severe winter storms. One night, he started an avalanche. He fell at least 300 feet, smashed his skis and suffered a severe concussion. His body was buried in snow, but his head was sticking out. He lost sense of time and self-possession. He was blind, the snow having scorched the retinas of his eyes.

He wandered aimlessly for four days, plagued by hallucinations. At one point he thought he had found a trail, but he was only following his own footsteps in a small circle.

Finally, he stumbled upon a cottage.

Read the whole column here. It’s worth it.

The book this story comes from is “We Die Alone” by David Howarth, and you can see a preview of it here, on Google Books. I think I might buy it. I respect our Olympians, but it’s a good reminder that: a) these Games have a quasi-military inspiration (Google “modern pentathlon” for example); and b) no matter how much struggle and competition there is over that gold medal — sometimes there’s something more at stake.

 

Dear Vanoc,

Congratulations on the successful Vancouver games. You had  a lot of criticism at the beginning, but you and Vancouver, and Canadians in general really pulled through, so kudos.

But we need to talk about the closing ceremonies.

No, not the floating beavers and dancing Mounties — that was actually pretty funny. I didn’t even mind the girls dressed as maple leaves.

Our talk is about the so-called “party” at the end, and the musical guests you decided to have perform at it.

Did we go back in time to 2004? Because I’m pretty sure that was the last time Nickelback or Avril Lavigne were relevant. Not to mention the pop/punk style of Simple Plan has been played to (I had hoped) death.

I can’t really hate on Alanis, because she’s so badass, but seriously, she hasn’t really done much in the last couple of years other than date Ryan Reynolds.

Your best choice that night was definitely K-os.

Vanoc, I think your problem was that you wanted artists to perform who were internationally known and famous. But I think you really squandered the chance to showcase some Canadian talent that is famous IN Canada.

And, who knows, maybe you tried to get other musicians and they just weren’t into it — I would be pretty bummed. But I hope you at least tried.

So, for posterity, here’s who I would have considered (and possibly badgered until they finally gave in). Artists that, to me, are truly Canadian:

-  The Tragically Hip

- Blue Rodeo

- Metric

- Sam Roberts

- Feist

And those are just the bigger names even in Canada. This isn’t even considering all the indie bands who are a lot lower key.

In closing, I think you did good things, Vanoc. But I think you dropped the ball when you wanted to pander to what the rest of the world knows about “Canadian” music.

Regards,

Amy

(ps. Who would you have liked to see at the games, readers?)

Feb 282010
 

As the Winter Olympics winds down in Vancouver, I’ll be watching (I guess) the hockey final. For true athletics, though, you should pay attention to the 50km men’s cross-country ski event, which takes place a little earlier.

That’s 50km, people — more than a marathon. And cross-country skiing is hard. I know, I used to coach it.

One of the things I’ve loved over the past couple of weeks has been reading all the stories out of Vancouver from foreign journalists. Sure, a lot of them are sports-related, but with hundreds of journalists all covering the same set of events, and everyone looking for a little local colour to differentiate their broadcasts, there’s been some interesting stuff.

Usually, if you’re reading a light feature about a faraway city, it was either written by the hometown paper, or by a travel writer who maybe spent a weekend there. For the Olympics, though, there’s been plenty of other eyes on the city.

I particularly enjoyed these four pieces:

1. “Vancouver’s secondhand stores: a real treasure trove” — The L.A. Times.

In which the writer discovers that Vancouver is not a cultural wasteland:

I packed carefully for my trip to Vancouver last autumn: my smartest New York-bought parka, layers of excellent textures, skinny cords, comfy walking shoes of real leather, and sneakers for the gym only.

Puffed with pride, I strode the chilly city until, on a corner in the Kitsilano neighborhood, the zipper on my parka broke and I faced an Angeleno’s dilemma: spending a fortune on a replacement I might wear a few times a year versus getting something blah and forsaking my fashion-plate look.

2. “Narrating Canada’s Quest for Gold in Men’s Hockey” — The New York Times.

In which the Canadian television play-by-play broadcasters are profiled in the New York Times, to their apparent disbelief:

In both delivery and demeanor, Cuthbert and Miller are pleasantly unpretentious, each cut from a much plainer cloth than the colorful Don Cherry. Speaking separately, each said his first reaction to an interview request was that it must be a practical joke.

3. “Leaving behind a thank-you note” — MSNBC

In which an American anchor comes to grips with all the Canadian-ness he’s about to leave behind:

Thank you, Canada … For your unique TV commercials — for companies like Tim Hortons — which made us laugh and cry. For securing this massive event without choking security, and without publicly displaying a single automatic weapon. For having the best garment design and logo-wear of the games — you’ve made wearing your name a cool thing to do.

4. “Will London be as British as Vancouver is Canadian?” — BBC

In which a Brit just cannot seem to come to grips with all the Canadian-ness he’s seeing:

This is a country so secure in its patriotism, so comfortable with its international reputation for “nice”, that when the American women appeared close to tears collecting their silver medals, Canadian fans thundered “U-S-A! U-S-A!” in sympathy. (Would English football fans do that for players from a rival team?)

Any other favourites you’ve seen?

A graphic look at the Olympics

 Posted by Grant Hamilton on 26 February 2010  Vintage/Retro
Feb 262010
 

The New York Times has a great video that goes back over the history of Olympic pictograms — those little stick-athletes doing all kinds of sports — and critiquing the good ones and the bad ones.

I tried to embed it, but you have to go to their site. Watch it here.

I don’t completely agree with everything — some of designer Stephen Heller’s judgments seem awfully arbitrary — but mostly, I can see what he’s saying. Some designers just tried too hard. Some just didn’t try at all.

It seems very difficult to strike a nice balance between ‘iconic and timeless’ and ‘new and different.’

 

Finally, a sport that combines the thrill and speed of skeleton with the sexy titillation of beach volleyball: topless tobogganing.

Here’s a video that proves it:

The video above is edited to be SFW, but this is is a co-ed sport, as the BBC’s video clearly shows — they were the only mainstream news organization I could find with the temerity to show jiggly lady-bits, but they are too staid to allow external embedding of their video.

Now, as you can clearly deduce, the Germans are way ahead of us in this sport. I say we must start to practice now — this evening! — if we expect to Own The Podium in Sochi, 2014.

UPDATE: Don’t think it’ll be popular? According to this German website (in English) 14,000 people showed up to the event, where some 30 people participated. Them’s Olympic-sized crowds! Oh, and photo gallery.

Feb 182010
 

I grew up as a cross-country skier, and I guess I always wanted to try biathlon, but my parents had this “thing” about not trusting me with guns.

Downhill skiing may be fast, and loaded with danger, but I would argue that cross-country skiing is much, much more difficult. And, if you want some danger, just add loaded rifles.

Sure, they shoot at stationary targets — but what if:

(via vodou’s Twitter stream)

 

I’ve always found it sort of sad that the Olympics are brought to you by mega corporate sponsorship in the first place, but the choices of some of the sponsors are so at odds with the pure athletic lifestyle that it’s even worse than sad, somehow. And perfectly summed up in this hilarious image from The Daily What.

 

The Canadian women’s hockey team opened the Olympic tournament in style, winning 18-0 over hapless Slovakia. Gotta feel for the Slovaks, at a certain point, the Canucks were just rubbing it in, right?

Well, maybe and maybe not. I’ve read justifications of lopsided wins in tournaments where, if there’s a tie in the standings at the end, total goals, or goral differentials are used to break that tie. So running up the score makes some sense.

But questions are being raised as to whether there should be a “mercy rule.” I don’t know how it would work — if you’re ahead by (say) 10 goals, do you win automatically? What if that’s at the end of the first period, and the underdog team still has two periods left to come back?

Or, are you just not allowed to be more than 10 ahead — so you can put the puck in the net all you want, but the score won’t go from 10 to 11 until the losing team gets at least one point?

And, why are we all so concerned about this in hockey? Let’s extend this to other sports. Frankly, in downhill skiing, where the winners are often decided by fractions of a second, the last-place contestant might be several seconds behind — doesn’t that count as a drubbing? Shouldn’t those insensitive winners be reined in a little?

Or what about figure skating. If some jerk pair gets perfect marks in figure skating, that’s just not fair to another couple who tried their best but got defeated.

Also, I think that I should be allowed to go to the Olympics and compete. I’m pretty sure that, by myself, I might be able to hold those Canadian women to, like, 16 or 17 goals.

O Nationalism, eh?

 Posted by Grant Hamilton on 12 February 2010  Modern Life
Feb 122010
 

Well, it’s time to gear up for the Olympics. And, if you squint real hard past all the advertising and sponsorship and naked ambition, you can still find that there’s evidence of the joy of sport in there, somewhere. That’s what I’ll watch it for (except I don’t have TV).

Still, it’s hard to forget that this isn’t just competition between athletes, it’s a competition between nations. And sometimes, that competition stirs up some pretty powerful emotions. Exhibit A: This video, which I’ve seen a couple people post on Facebook the last few days:

While I appreciate the “Heritage Moments” homages (no, really, I do!) I just can’t quite get with this video. Hey, I’m Canadian, and I’m glad that I am. But one of the things I have always liked about Canada is that we get by without all this chest-thumping, in-your-face patriotism.

Okay, yes, instead we have to put up with neurotic insecurities about our place on the globe, but I’m secure enough in myself that that’s never bothered me — and I would rather not be identified with a mob of Maple-Leaf-wearing hooligans.

Not so the rest of the country, according to this video, which features Canada’s Eminem rapping the same tired homilies (“we invented the telephone!” — except, no we didn’t*) over samples of the national anthem. I’m glad that some people can get this stirred up over their country. But to me, it smells an awful lot like primitive tribalism. And the Maple Leaf fetish has to be a triumph of inspired branding — the iconic one on the flag is less than 50 years old as a symbol of the country, but athletes are getting them tattooed on their bodies.

I’m not trying to be dour. I will enjoy the Olympics, I promise! But I’m much more looking forward to the individual athletic achievement of underdogs — no matter what their country — than of Owning The Podium.

__________
(*Alexander Graham Bell was from Scotland, emigrated to Canada when he was 23, and invented the telephone while working in Boston a few years later, having spent less than two years in Canada.)

Dec 062009
 

Clever little bit of journalism in the New York Times this weekend, profiling the city of Vancouver. But not THAT one.

You see, across the U.S.-Canada border, there are two Vancouvers. The one in British Columbia will be hosting the Olympics in a couple of months. The one in Washington State will not.

Personally, I’m ambivalent about the Olympics themselves (love the spirit of peaceful competition between nations, dislike the corporate sponsor overtones and absolutely detest the sacrifice of civil liberties that seem to be required), but I am happy to see that Vancouver, Wash., is taking the opportunity to do some soul searching and carve out an identity for itself. There seems to be a movement afoot to rename it Fort Vancouver, for example, but I think I prefer the self-deprecating humour exemplified by Gene Wigglesworth:

popup

“My mother always thought I lived in Canada,” said Gene Wigglesworth, who moved here in 1977 to open a muffler repair shop. “For years, I’ve put up with that.” …. [He] gets at much of this in a T-shirt that he sells in town. It reads:

Vancouver
not B.C.
Washington
not D.C
Clark County
not Nevada
Near Portland, Or.
not Maine

He has an idea for another shirt: “If you are in the Federal Witness Protection Program, do we have a city for you.”

Read the full story here.

(The Times has been doing other stuff like this lately — I remember reading a piece that tracked down folks who shared named with famous people and ex-presidents. It’s a good way to get ‘ordinary people’ into the paper. And as a journalist, I like to be reminded that every person has years worth of interesting in them — not everyone has to be a criminal or a politician or a businessperson to deserve to be in the paper.)

Feb 252009
 
Photo from a New York Times series examining the true impact of the Chinese Olympics.

Photo from a New York Times series examining the true impact of the Chinese Olympics.

China’s Olympics were stunning — a tour de force from start to finish, by every single account that I’ve read. It’s incalculable just how much money they poured into the venues, the accommodations, the atheletes themselves, and spectacle that surrounded the Games. (Some calculations peg it at $43 billion, but I think that’s low. It’s still triple any other host city.)

Now the question is, how much of that was wasted? I’ve read often that Olympic host cities, even if they go into debt over the Games themselves, are left with a net benefit, in terms of actual buildings and athletic facilities that can be put to good use for years to come. I just visited the Stade Olympique in Montreal a couple of years ago — and its subway was top-notch. That’s 33 years on, and still providing benefits.

Calgary is still using its Saddledome and alpine facilities — in fact, they’re renting out some 88 Olympic facilities to the Brits for 2010.

Vancouver hopes to use the athletes village for social housing.

But China might be left with some gigantic white elephants. From the LA Times:

Six months after the Games ended, [Beijing] continues to dazzle by night, with neon and floodlights dancing across the skyline. By day, though, it is obvious that many are “see-through” buildings, to use the term coined during the Texas real estate bust of the 1980s.

… 500 million square feet of commercial real estate has been developed in Beijing since 2006, more than all the office space in Manhattan. And that doesn’t include huge projects developed by the government … 100 million square feet of office space is vacant — a 14-year supply.

Yikes. The “Bird’s Nest” stadium? Empty except for one day this year. A less-than-a-year-old baseball stadium? Up for demolition. The press centre? “Cavernous” and “empty” says the Times:

The makeover of Beijing for the Olympics led to an estimated 1.5 million residents being evicted from their homes, according to the Geneva-based Center on Housing Rights and Evictions.

In this vibrant capital city of 17 million, there is an insatiable demand for housing, yet prices remain far out of reach of most residents …. Homes are being advertised for more than $1 million in gated communities …. Two- and three-bedroom apartments are offered for $800,000 …

The average salary in Beijing is less than $6,000 a year.