Well, wasn’t this a kick in the ol’ vocabulary to start the morning.
Apparently, starfish aren’t really “fish” — so marine biologists would prefer if we called them “sea stars” instead.

Setting aside the pedantic facts that “sea stars” also aren’t great burning orbs of gas light-years away, or twinkly in the night firmament, or that many of them don’t live in the sea, but rather in the ocean, I think this raises an interesting question:
What are we going to call seahorses?
No, but seriously, why do we have to change the name? I know that starfish isn’t precisely accurate, but if some laypeople happen to miscategorize a marine invertebrate as a fish, then what’s the harm?
The Wikipedia page for Starfish now redirects to Sea Star, but the “talk” page discussion is enlightening. As many people point out, if we’re going to start changing common but misleading names, then we’re going to have to include killer whales (actually dolphins), koala bears (not bears), jellyfish (probably more closely related to starfish than to actual fish), banana trees (not trees), and sand dollars (which I’ve never been able to spend, not once).
I’ve Googled this a bit, and “starfish” is by far the most common name. Now, I’ll be the first to admit that popularity doesn’t make it right — if that were true, a “drive thru” would be the correct spelling. But everywhere that mentions “sea stars” also tends to mention that marine biologists are making a concerted effort to push this name. And yet I can’t find a genesis for this idea — no marine biologist mailing list that says “hey folks, let’s change the name” or a press release that lays out the new terminology or anything.
Since they have five arms, and they are vaguely tentacle like, I’d hereby like to propose that we all switch to the name “pentatent” instead. Clear?







Now that could be interesting! Overhauling a whole writing system and not just a computer system.