Dec 272009
 

I was riveted by a story in the New Yorker about China’s huge shift towards renewable energy. I’ve been reading Thomas Friedman’s pieces in the New York Times about it for a while, but it’s easy to dismiss an opinion columnist as hyping something, even when you kind of agree with him.

A first-person account of the massive investment that China is making, though, made much more of an impact on me. Called the 863 Program (it was conceived in March of 1986), the Chinese initiative hasn’t been perfect, but it’s been dedicated, where in North America, the political will has come and gone, started and stopped:

In 2001, Chinese officials abruptly expanded one program in particular: energy technology. The reasons were clear. Once the largest oil exporter in East Asia, China was now adding more than two thousand cars a day and importing millions of barrels; its energy security hinged on a flotilla of tankers stretched across distant seas. Meanwhile, China was getting nearly eighty per cent of its electricity from coal, which was rendering the air in much of the country unbreathable and hastening climate changes that could undermine China’s future stability. Rising sea levels were on pace to create more refugees in China than in any other country, even Bangladesh.

In 2006, Chinese leaders redoubled their commitment to new energy technology; they boosted funding for research and set targets for installing wind turbines, solar panels, hydroelectric dams, and other renewable sources of energy that were higher than goals in the United States. China doubled its wind-power capacity that year, then doubled it again the next year, and the year after. The country had virtually no solar industry in 2003; five years later, it was manufacturing more solar cells than any other country, winning customers from foreign companies that had invented the technology in the first place.

Read the full piece here.

Dec 052009
 

exhibition_51_media_file_233

When I think of climate change, often my first thought is for low-lying oceanic island nations, like Palau, which might be completely swamped by rising sea levels. But lately things like polar bears have cropped up in my local news (they are apparently cannibalizing their young, because the artic ice floes they rely on are too thin to hunt).

I’ve read before that the Arctic might be one of the forefronts of climate change, so it makes the 60-year-old photo, above, newly relevant.

Taken by Canadian photographer Richard Harrington, it depicts a  Padleimuit mother feeding her child a piece of caribou skin at starvation camp in 1950. (For the interested, it’s a gelatin silver print that’s 16 x 20 inches.)

During his trips to the Arctic, Harrington found that a shift in caribou migration routes had left some remote villages starving. He helped raise awareness of the issue. Unfortunately, these are the types of issues that I fear we’ll soon be confronting once again.

There is an exhibit of these photos, by the way, currently on at the Winnipeg Art Gallery. If you’re in the neighbourhood, stop by.

(Believe it or not, I was put on to this through this story in the online edition of the Brandon Sun. I know, right?)

Dec 032009
 

Stephen Harper was (I believe) the first sitting Prime Minister to offer an official Canadian apology, which he did last year to Canadian aboriginals, saying he was sorry for their cumulative experiences in residential schools.

Greenpeace thinks he’ll have to make another apology, in a decade or so. Here’s their take on it:

gre_02_672-458_resize

From BoingBoing, which quotes ‘Darren‘:

Greenpeace is running a clever ad campaign in the Copenhagen airport in preparation for the Copenhagen climate negotiations that start on Dec. 7. They’re a series of ads featuring Photoshopped images of sad-looking world leaders, apologizing for not addressing climate change when they had the chance. Canada’s Prime Minister looks like the saddest hockey coach in the land.

I hope this billboard stares Stephen Harper right in the face. Greenpeace has also Obama, Merkel and Medvedev, among others that I didn’t recognize, in their slideshow.

Dec 022009
 

The following story is one of the top-five most-viewed on The Guardian:

Canada’s image lies in tatters. It is now to climate what Japan is to whaling

Subheadline: “The tar barons have held the nation to ransom. This thuggish petro-state is today the greatest obstacle to a deal in Copenhagen”

Yes, that’s right — we’re a “thuggish petro-state.” But here’s the money quote:

So here I am, watching the astonishing spectacle of a beautiful, cultured nation turning itself into a corrupt petro-state. Canada is slipping down the development ladder, retreating from a complex, diverse economy towards dependence on a single primary resource, which happens to be the dirtiest commodity known to man. The price of this transition is the brutalisation of the country, and a government campaign against multilateralism as savage as any waged by George Bush.

Columnist George Monbiot also calls Canada “the real villain” (eclipsing the United States) and says “Canada now threatens the wellbeing of the world.”

Yes, this is about climate change and if you don’t agree with global warming then nothing I can say will convince you. But hopefully you care about international opinion. And even if you don’t, hopefully you’ll see that the Harper-led process to evade international climate-change agreements and to develop and commercialize the oil sands has been a scorched-earth political process that is wrecking more than just the climate.

Thanks, Harper. Thanks a lot.

Oct 252009
 

roof_view2

If this works as advertised, I think it’ll be fantastic. Although the picture here is small, you can get a good idea of the design of this roof-mounted windmill on the RidgeBlade website:

The RidgeBlade is fitted on the ridge line at the top of a building and uses the existing roof area to collect and focus the prevailing wind. This is where the wind is forced to travel over the roof surface, accelerating the airflow though the turbine.

If I had to describe it, I might say it’s like a long, skinny water wheel. The low profile makes it ideal for places where NIMBY-types want to preserve their views of the skyline, and I’d wager it would be easy to install — almost a DIY project.

(via PatJ’s Twitter feed, retweeted from Canadianmags. Ah, Twitter.)

Sep 212009
 

Okay, the question is more like this:

Which uses all more electricity: all the video game consoles in the United States (Xbox, PS3, Wii, etc), or the entire city of San Diego?

The answer is, they’re tied. I’ll throw some numbers at you, for context:

  • 40 per cent of all homes in the U.S. have at least one console
  • San Diego is the ninth-largest city in the U.S.
  • A PS3 or an XBox uses about as much energy over a year as two brand-new refrigerators
  • A Wii uses less than 15% the power of a PS3 or an XBox
  • There are 1.3 million people in San Diego, many of them chugging air conditioners in the southern California heat.

My eyes just about popped out of my head when I realized just how much power is being used by people leaving their video games on for days at a time, just because it’s easier than hitting the save button.

I learned about this from a New York Times story, but you can download the original report here, where you will also find out that using you game console as a Blu-Ray player uses several times more energy than a standalone player would.

Oh, and by the way: that’s 16 billion kWh of energy that San Diego and video games each use every year. The report’s authors estimate that 11 billion kWh of that could be trimmed with simple energy-saving ideas like an auto-save hibernation feature, like the one on your laptop.

Sep 082009
 

National Gengraphic is reporting on a report from the UK’s Royal Society, which looks at five ways to combat global warming. The twist? It’s five ways to cool the earth that basically involve changing it more, to “cool” it artificially, and to counteract the warming trend.

To me, that’s like saying your coffee is too sweet, better add some salt to it.

For the record, the proposals include three versions of shading the earth — microscopic droplets of sulphur dioxide, seawater mist or space mirrors. The final two are huge-scale engineering projects that envision artificial trees, sucking CO2 out of the atmosphere, or dissolving mountains. Yes, seriously.

When I was a kid, these proposals were called “terraforming” and they were universally employed in sci-fi stories where far-future astronauts were trying to make an alien planet more Earth-like. How sad that we’ve come to the point where we’re faced with doing the same thing — to Earth itself.

Aug 272009
 

Watermelons

Like watermelons? Me too! Especially when you upend a bottle of vodka into them and make a tasty adult picnic snack.

So while it doesn’t surprise me that watermelons and alcohol go together, I was pleased to learn that watermelons may be the next go-to crop for making ethanol. I learned from Slashdot that the USDA is looking at watermelons for ethanol production, citing their high levels of fermentable sugars.

Why is this better than corn, which is how most of our ethanol currently ges produced? Well, waste corn can be processed into lots of different things — from corn syrup to animal feed — and ethanol is just one use for it.

But, apparently upwards of 20% of watermelon production is just left on the fields, because it’s not pretty enough to humans to buy it in the store. That waste product can be fermented into ethanol.

Eventually, of course, the holy grail is to take completely unusable woody plant stalks, which we mostly just plough under right now, and turn that into ethanol, but we haven’t figured out how to break it down yet. In the meantime, anything that gets us off of corn-based ethanol (or, worse, sugar-cane-based) is good in my books.

(Watermelon pic from Flickr user babasteve)

Aug 272009
 

090826-sturgeon

Three Black Russian sturgeon that are currently swimming at the University of Manitoba have grown too big for their tanks and need a new home, according to a story in the Winnipeg Free Press:

Black Russian sturgeons can grow to about four metres in length and weigh nearly 50 kilograms. In the wild, they live between 30 and 50 years but in captivity they could live to be nearly a century old, provided they’re kept in a sufficiently large tank.

Terry Dick, a professor in biological sciences at the U of M, said fish this size obviously can’t be kept in the same bowl as your goldfish.

“They would have to go to a public aquarium,” he said, noting the three fish are now each a metre in length, after having arrived at one-tenth that size.

Although the Freep says that there are three fish, the original press release at the University of Manitoba refers to “Igor and his three friends”:

The sturgeons, Acipenser gueldenstaedtii, are renowned for producing great caviar. They are also docile – open the tank lid and they come to the surface for petting – and they are big: they currently stretch about a meter in length but will grow to four meters.

Technically the Canadian Wildlife Services own the fish so all owners need to be approved by them, but staff members in the department of biological sciences are propositioning aquariums and research study groups.

“We love taking care of them but we can’t do it for much longer because they’re getting too big for us,” a spokesperson said. “It will be sad to see them go but as long as they go to a good home we’ll be happy.”

The fish were seized from smugglers about two years ago and would be worth big bucks on the black market for their caviar.

I haven’t been to the Assiniboine Zoo in ages — do they have any kind of aquariam/tank facility? Seems a shame to ship these fish off somewhere else when they could be an asset in Manitoba.

And come on — maybe it would take some money to construct and run such a facility, but a “Black Russian” fundraiser? It writes itself!

(Picture by Joe Bryska, Winnipeg Free Press. I am *assuming* that by watermarking their image, the Free Press is tacitly allowing people to copy and use it. I have linked the picture back to the original article. However, as always, if you have copyright concerns, contact me and I’m happy to work something out.)

Aug 172009
 

When it comes to economic development, I think Aboroginals/First Nations/Indians are hamstrung pretty badly. At least in Canada (I’m not 100% up on the American situation), I know that native tribes don’t actually own the land their reserves are situated on, and their types of business/industry are restricted.

Unfortunately, a lot of bands turn to casinos, which we could argue about all day, but which I don’t think are the magical money machines they’re made out to be. That’s especially true if you happen to be a remotely-located tribe.

However, the Southern Ute Indian Tribe, perched on top of massive coal and natural-gas deposits, is investing their efforts in a slightly different direction — renewable energy. From a story in the New York Times:

[The tribe] had to surmount many hurdles to find an alternative energy idea it considered suitable.

For example, any project that would displace land used for growing food was tossed out for philosophical reasons: the Southern Utes’ belief that energy and food should not compete in a world where people still starve. That eliminated discussion of corn-based ethanol.

And whatever was chosen had to be at least technically feasible, if not immediately profitable.

So they’ve turned to a University of Colorado startup that is trying to turn algae into vegetable-oil fuel. Plus, with an algae tank located next to a tribal natural-gas facility, they’re able to use waste heat and waste carbon dioxide to warm and feed the algae.

This is exactly the type of win-win-win situation that I love to hear about. Iron Eyes Cody, dry your tears.

Jul 232009
 

dairy milk

According to several news sources, Cadbury-Schweppes is embarking on an ambitious program to get all of its chocolate from Fair Trade sources. First up is the iconic Dairy Milk bar, and it’s a UK-only program for now. A story in the Guardian says that the high current price of chocolate on the open market makes the switch to fairly traded chocolate economically easy, but Cadbury has set a “floor” price which will never go down, even if the market declines. This should ensure that the chocolate farmers (primarily in Ghana) where Dairy Milk starts its journey to your hips, will always receive a fair price. (Read more about Fair Trade concepts here.)

Even better, though, is that Cadbury will add a $150 per tonne “social premium”. That’s just under 10% of the cost of the chocolate. From the Guardian story:

The terms of the Cadbury agreement will triple the volume of Fairtrade cocoa bought from Ghana to 15,000 tonnes, with the social premium ploughed into farming communities weakened by urbanisation and low crop yields. Poor incomes are discouraging young people from farming cocoa in the country, where the average age of cocoa farmers is 51. It is therefore seen as also in the interest of chocolate manufacturers such as Cadbury to increase farm incomes, securing sustainable supplies around the world.

Rival Mars has pledged to buy 100% of its cocoa from sustainable sources by 2020, and has chosen to work with the Rainforest Alliance, with the logo carried on its Galaxy bars. Nestlé, meanwhile, is working with the International and World Cocoa foundations.

Interestingly, Cadbury has for several years been at the forefront of ecological/environmental awareness — at least, at the margins, it has been. I read ages ago about a “bioplastic” that Cadbury is using for its trays of chocolates in Australia. The plastic, which is manufactured not from oil, but from corn, dissolves in the rain.

I know it’s early days, but I’m disappointed that these initiatives are still just in small parts of the world. Perhaps it’s an issue with corn-based plastic manufacturers having to ramp up their production? Kudos to Cadbury for being one of the apparent leaders in this area. I’d also like to note that for the past couple of years, at folk festivals in this area of western Canada, I’ve been drinking Big Rock beer out of compostable cups. Also, cupsuckers are awesome.

So there are some inroads being made, even in consumerist North America. Acutally, come to think of it, I also got a package a few weeks ago that had corn-based “plastic pellets” instead of those styrofoam peanuts as packing material. I ran them under the tap, and sure enough, they dissolve into slimy mush. It’s so much better than lives-forever styrofoam.

Maybe even Big Macs will go back to the once-iconic foam clamshell. Not that I’d eat them, mind you, but I would appreciate the design.

Jun 132009
 

pumpguy2

There was a big to-do on Wednesday, as government and industry came together in Ottawa to tout the “world’s first” cellulosistic ethanol-blended gasoline at a Shell station.

All the news came in a flurry, as happens with a demonstration that’s tailored to the media. The big news is that this is ethanol made from straw and other agricultural detritus, instead of making ethanol from food-grade corn that could be put to better use.

This was big news for Canada, and it made headlines internationally (okay, small headlines). But it was, um, false.

So why haven’t I seen any followup in the Canadian media? I just happened across a story in the New York Times that unearthed this:

MacEwen Petroleum, a small regional service station chain based in Maxville, Ontario … apparently beat the multinational giant to the punch almost five years ago at a station in downtown Ottawa. And it did so, it seems, using ethanol from Iogen, a cellulosic ethanol maker also based in Ottawa, which recently became half-owned by Shell.

When? Five years ago? Yup. The Times says it was a Grey Cup promotion, but the gas retailer continues to buy cellulose-based ethanol when it can. And now Shell has changed its tune, saying:

“We believe this is the first customer offering where over a month long period consumers can knowingly purchase gasoline with a 10 percent blend of cellulosic ethanol, and the first time it has been actively marketed.”

Sorry MacEwen, even though you did it five years ago, marketed it heavily, continue to buy cellulosistic ethanol all the time, but simply can’t guarantee there’s no residual “regular” ethanol in your tanks because your supplier got bought out by your competitor, I guess you’re just going to have to pretend that it doesn’t count because you didn’t do it for a whole month.

Why isn’t this a bigger story in Canada? It’s a world’s first by two homegrown Ontario companies, they were usurped half a decade later by a multinational, and it ties in with the freaking Grey Cup!

Jun 082009
 

I was kind of entranced by this video at the World Without Us website. Although I’m sure the timeline is speculative and fuzzy at best, it’s an intersting concept. Based on the book (now optioned as a movie, I believe), “World Without Us” postulates what would happen if humans just up and disappeared. (There’s also a similar miniseries currently running on the History Channel.)

Although the book reviews have focused cities and skyscrapers, this video takes that concept at a small scale: one single house.

My grandmother’s house was a farm house much like the one in the video, actually, and it’s been vacant for about 25 years now. I haven’t been out there in a while, but the last time I went (and you can see this in many old, abandoned buildings) it’s surprising how much decay a building can take, and still be fairly functional. I mean, the floor may be soft, and the roof may leak, but even after decades, most buildings would still provide pretty adequate shelter, in a pinch, if you had firewood and a couple of tarps, say.

Anyway, I found the video kind of poignant:

Jun 022009
 

bkbaloney

I was flabbergasted at this story on The Guardian:

Davis: Hi, I’m calling from the Flyer about your sign. Does Burger King really think global warming is baloney?
BK: [Hang-up]
Davis: [Calling back]: Your sign out front says global warming is baloney.
BK: I don’t see that, sir.
Davis: Well, it does.
BK: I don’t see that sir… I change the signs and that sign’s been up for a week.
Davis: Well, I have pictures that I took this afternoon…So, there’s no question that your sign said it and so did one in Midtown. I want to know if it was on purpose, or if it was a prank someone pulled on you.
BK: Let me get the manager. [several minutes of dead air then the same or very similar voice picks up.]
BK: Who were you holding for?
Davis: A manager, about the sign. I have pictures of the sign and people have called me upset. I just want to know if it’s a mistake or not so I can report it.
BK: Let me go outside and look at the sign and I’ll call you right back. [exchange of contact info]
[Phone rings, Davis answers]
BK: The sign was put up yesterday.
Davis: And it’s not a mistake?
BK: No.
Davis: It reflects the opinion of BK international?
BK: Yes. Would you like to talk to the home office? I can give you a number.
Davis: I’ve got the number, I’ve already contacted them. Thanks.

Read the full story, follow the links. Sounds like an overzealous “holding company” which owns a number of franchises decided to get a little political.

May 302009
 

That’s the Aral Sea. The thin black line demarcates how big it originally was. But, after decades of damming and irrigation use, it’s shrunk to a fraction of its original size.

That’s just one of the pause-inducing videos featured in a Wired gallery about human changes to the earth. They’ve also got time-laspe videos of the Dubai urbanization, deforestation in the Amazon and a drought in Utah, among others.

I really hope we’re not screwing things up beyond repair, but I fear … I fear …