Apr 272009
 

jasper

Talking out of turn … that’s a paddling. Looking out the window … that’s a paddling. Staring at my sandals … that’s a paddling. Paddling the school canoe … ooh, you better believe that’s a paddling.

Turns out that corporal punishment might actually work. At least according to an article in Newsweek that looks at the remarkable turnaround in one school:

As punishment for a “major offense,” such as fighting or stealing, students are told to place both hands on the seat of a leather chair and brace for what [principal David] Nixon calls “a whippin’.” Before he begins, though, he sits the child down for a quiet talk about why he, or she, is in trouble. He tries to determine if a deeper issue, such as a problem at home, might warrant a meeting with a counselor. If the child shows remorse, Nixon will often send him or her back to class without a spanking. Otherwise, he makes sure he is calm, and he makes sure his elbow is still. Then he delivers “three licks” to the child’s rear end. If the child is a girl, then a female administrator does it. Some of the kids cry. Some are silent. Some want a hug. And after the child is sent back to class, still stinging, Nixon sits alone in his office and thinks about what the child has done, and what he has done. “If I could burn that paddle in my stove,” Nixon says, “I would. This is the worst part of my job.”

I was never paddled in school. I don’t even know if corporal punishment still happened at any of the schools I went to. But I do know that we believed it did. And that belief kept us in pretty good line. That’s pretty much the experience found in the article linked above. Once the kids know that there is an immediate, serious consequence for bad behaviour, misbehaviour dropped dramatically.

Food for thought.

Grant Hamilton

  • MPot

    Anecdotes do not evidence make . . .

  • http://www.absurdintellectual.com/ Grant Hamilton

    I agree — and in ther article there are plenty of other reasons given for the turnaround. In reality, it’s probably some combination of multiple factors that came together.

    And even if we assume that it’s corporal punishment that keeps the kids in line — we still don’t know if that’s a positive development at all. Maybe they are more likely to turn out to be criminals after they leave the structure of the school and enter the chaos of society.

  • Colin Corneau

    MPot, your argument can go both ways on the issue.

  • MPot

    Of course. I wasn’t arguing for or against, just advising caution.

  • Colin Corneau

    Well, I’m sure we can agree that children are not made to be beaten. They’re made to work on looms and assemble explosives with their tiny, nimble fingers.

  • Stumpy

    @G: Sounds as if the school is building a structure for the students, which seems to go a long way. Give students some rules that they can clearly understand what is right/wrong and why, and give rewards/punishments to help kids learn that they are ultimately responsible for their actions and the consequences. Whatever “big” punishment is given to children needs to be something that is uncomfortable for them – and from my own experience of being paddled as a little wombat, the experience was more embarrassing than painful, and certainly not abusive. I’m not sure that corporal punishment is the best thing to do, but it is difficult to think of other alternatives – I was thinking of community service, but I also wouldn’t want children to associate volunteerism with punishment, either.

  • MPot

    A little wombat? Working on a loom? Where am I?